info@triniteconsulting.com
+1 (224) 385 9760
The Challenges:
The insurer was experiencing renewal premium loss despite having a significant book of existing insureds with strong potential for renewal.
The challenge was not a lack of renewal opportunities, but the absence of a structured, early-stage renewal decision process that could clearly separate:
Business to retain → Prioritize early and initiate renewal action
Business to exit → Identify early and initiate the non-renewal process
Without this discipline, valuable renewal opportunities could be lost, while operational resources continued to be consumed by accounts that were unlikely to be retained.
Our Solution:
Trinite redesigned the renewal process around an Early Renewal Decision Framework.
Instead of treating every policy the same, an early assessment mechanism was introduced to identify renewal opportunities, flag undesirable business, establish clear ownership, and initiate appropriate actions well before policy expiry.
Read the Full Guide
Enter your email address to unlock the complete case study results.
Early Renewal Assessment
Policies were prioritized based on defined business and performance criteria.
Qualified renewal solicitations were sent 90 days before policy expiry, ensuring that viable renewal opportunities entered the process early rather than being addressed close to the expiration date.
Policies identified as potentially loss-making or undesirable were flagged for early underwriting review instead of automatically progressing through the standard renewal cycle.
This established separate processes for identifying business to retain and business requiring further underwriting review.
Renewal and Non-Renewal Actions
Defined ownership, timelines, and follow-up procedures were established for policies identified for retention.
Where the decision was to exit the business, the required intent-to-non-renew process was initiated early rather than allowing these policies to consume additional resources throughout the renewal cycle.
This approach established distinct actions for policies identified for retention and those requiring non-renewal.
Operational Support
Repetitive renewal activities were standardized, and suitable operational tasks were transitioned to a scalable offshore support model.
This provided a structured approach to managing renewal-related operational activities while allowing underwriters to concentrate on activities requiring their expertise and decision-making.
Structured Follow-Up and Escalation
The offshore team followed up three times during the first 45 days of the renewal cycle.
Where there was no response or an adverse response, the case was escalated to the respective underwriter for further action.
The process was structured around a target of 90% renewal for qualified renewal opportunities, supported by defined follow-up and escalation procedures.
Results
By combining early decision-making, disciplined workflows, and operational execution, the insurer achieved measurable improvements across the renewal process.
30
Percentage-Point Reduction in Non-Renewal
Non-renewal decreased from 40% to 10%.
50%
Increase in Renewal Premium / Revenue Retained
More renewal premium was retained through the revised renewal process.
10%
Reduction in Renewal Processing Effort
Renewal processing effort decreased following the introduction of standardized workflows and offshore operational support.
15%
Increase in Early Identification
The early identification of policies requiring underwriting action increased by 15%.
Summary
The insurer was experiencing renewal premium loss despite having a significant book of existing insureds with strong renewal potential. The underlying challenge was the absence of a structured, early-stage process to distinguish business to retain from business to exit.
Trinite introduced an Early Renewal Decision Framework that prioritized qualified renewal opportunities, identified potential non-renewals early, established defined ownership and timelines, and incorporated structured follow-ups, underwriting escalation, and offshore operational support.
The revised process reduced non-renewal from 40% to 10%, increased renewal premium/revenue retained by 50%, reduced renewal processing effort by 10%, and improved the early identification of policies requiring underwriting action by 15%.
The case illustrates how renewal can be approached as a revenue protection process rather than simply an annual administrative exercise. By establishing clear decision criteria, initiating renewal and non-renewal actions early, and implementing structured operational workflows, insurers can better manage renewal opportunities and the resources allocated to them.
